The development of literacy is a fundamental educational goal. Teachers play a vital role in enabling students to become literate and so attain the potential to become a life-long learner.
There have been many studies that have shown that literacy levels are significantly lower among students from low socio-economic backgrounds. Recent data shows that there is a significant correlation to the socio-economic background of the student and the student’s AIM data.
Literacy, language awareness and reading can be taught effectively. Research shows that the human brain is wired to learn oral language but it is not wired to learn to read. Yet reading skills form the basis of all school level learning. “Research indicates that a student’s future academic success can be predicted by his or her reading level at the end of grade three” (Wolfe and Nevills 2004).
Learning to read is facilitated by explicit teaching and explicit practice in the home. Students from low socio-economic backgrounds often require extra teaching of the function of reading. Programs that include the teaching of phonemic awareness, alphabetic awareness and oral language are the most complete system of teaching the ability to read.
Typically, students from low socio-economic backgrounds have been brought up in a household where casual and intimate language registers are the norm. They have not learned (through immersion or through explicit teaching) how to use the consultative or the formal language register. Frozen language register is known of but not employed in the upbringing of the child from a low socio-economic background.
See the following information to learn more about literacy, socio-economic disadvantage and the implications these have on schools:
Since 1999, literacy and numeracy data point to ongoing improvements in standards across year levels. Most importantly, the results of those students who have previously had low performance have improved.
“Despite all that has been achieved over the past four years, we need to concentrate further upon improved learning outcomes for students. Some groups of students continue to have poor levels of literacy and other basic skills. These students can be concentrated in particular schools and particular areas of the state. They tend to have high rates of absenteeism from school and are more likely to leave schools early. There are also high variations in outcomes between classes within schools and between schools with similar student populations. “ - Blueprint for Government Schools, November, 2003
Effective literacy and numeracy are key skills which enable all Australians to successfully participate in schooling until the completion of Year 12, and in further study, training or work.
In Australian society proficiency in English literacy is of major importance for every Australian's personal, social and cultural development. For a modern democratic society, high levels of literacy are crucial to the quality of civic, cultural and economic activity. High levels of literacy for all Australians are required so that each individual can deal confidently with the broadening scope and multiple uses of literacy in all spheres of society. (Department of Employment Education and Youth Affairs, 1998)
Disadvantage at school can be seen to be strongly linked to disadvantage at home, it is clear that educational disadvantage is born not at school but in the home, it may be predicted that disadvantage is likely to perpetuate itself through educational under-achievement and a greater likelihood of economic marginalisation and social exclusion.
(A League Table of Educational Disadvantage in Rich Nations, United Nations Children’s Fund Inocenti Research Centre, 2002)
Success in school-based literacy practices beyond the early years of schooling, requires students to experience continued, multiple and differentiated opportunities for enhancing meta-cognitive and meta-linguistic awareness.
1. A strategic, whole school capacity building approach to change with a dynamic and synergetic interrelationship between:
2. Innovations occurring in curriculum, assessment, pedagogy, school organisation need to be presented less as external demands or formal requirements and more as opportunities for creativity, initiative and the exercise of professional leadership and responsibility.
3. Schools should consider more creative and innovatory practices in the way the school day/ week/ year is organised and in the definition of roles and responsibilities for the range of professionals working in them.
4. Schools should provide a high quality working environment for teachers as professionals and as adults, to promote and sustain job satisfaction.